|
|
|
In Vt., an attorney general's losses raise doubts
Attorney News |
2012/01/25 09:47
|
The first was Vermont's campaign finance law setting the lowest contribution limits in the country — shot down by the U.S. Supreme Court.
The same fate befell the state's attempt to restrict drug company efforts to collect data on doctors' prescribing habits. On a 6-3 vote, the justices said Vermont's law was an unconstitutional infringement on free speech by drug and data collecting companies.
Now, in yet another case that has garnered national attention, the office of Vermont Attorney General William Sorrell has suffered a stinging defeat, this time in a federal trial over the state's bid to close the Vermont Yankee nuclear plant.
Some observers are starting to see a pattern — one in which Sorrell and his team have gone to the legal big leagues three times and fallen flat on each attempt.
"The state now has sort of a reputation in the 2nd Circuit and the Supreme Court of not having their act together," said Patrick Parenteau, a former state commissioner of environmental conservation who is now a professor at Vermont Law School. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
High court to hear suit over Cheney event arrest
Attorney News |
2011/12/05 10:22
|
The Supreme Court said Monday it will hear an appeal from Secret Service agents who say they should be shielded from a lawsuit over their arrest of a Colorado man who confronted Vice President Dick Cheney.
The justices will review a federal appeals court decision to allow Steven Howards of Golden, Colo., to pursue his claim that the arrest violated his free speech rights. Howards was detained by Cheney's security detail in 2006 after he told Cheney of his opposition to the war in Iraq.
Howards also touched Cheney on the shoulder, then denied doing so under questioning. Appellate judges in Denver said the inconsistency gave the agents reason to arrest Howards.
Even so, the appeals court said Howards could sue the agents for violating his rights — an unusual twist that the agents and the Obama administration said conflicts with other appeals court decisions and previous high court rulings in similar cases.
Justice Elena Kagan is not taking part in the case, probably because she worked on it while serving in the Justice Department. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
UIHC Social Worker Fired After Guilty Plea
Attorney News |
2011/11/14 11:24
|
The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics has fired a veteran social worker weeks after he pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct following an arrest on charges that he assaulted his teenage daughter.
UI spokesman Tom Moore said last week that Frank Sammet's "term of service" ended Oct. 19 but would not say whether he resigned or was fired. After repeated follow-up questions and an appeal to his superior by The Associated Press, Moore acknowledged Sammet was fired but wouldn't say why.
The firing is a change for the university, which had allowed Sammet to continue seeing patients for months even as he was fighting a domestic abuse charge alleging that he choked, punched and kicked his 18-year-old daughter Feb. 2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High court to decide double jeopardy question
Attorney News |
2011/10/12 09:43
|
The Supreme Court will decide whether a jury forewoman's offhand comment that the jury was unable to make a decision on a murder charge means the suspect can't be retried on that charge.
The high court on Tuesday agreed to hear an appeal from Alex Blueford, whose murder trial in Arkansas ended in a hung jury.
The jury forewoman told the judge before he declared a mistrial that the jury had voted unanimously against capital murder and first-degree murder. The jury had deadlocked on a lesser charge, manslaughter, which caused the judge to declare a mistrial.
Blueford argued the forewoman's statement, said in open court, meant that he has been acquitted of capital murder and first-degree murder.
Prosecutors decided to retry Blueford on all three charges. He contended he could not be retried on capital murder and first-degree murder because of Fifth Amendment double jeopardy protections.
Arkansas courts have disagreed. The high court will now review that decision.
Blueford was on trial for killing his girlfriend's 20-month-old son. |
|
|
|
|
|
Legal News RSS Feed
